Case 2302361/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Oliveira v Kingdom Cleaning Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302361/2022
- Decision date
- 16 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Macey Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Oliveira
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a costs judgment, not a substantive liability judgment. Employment Judge Macey, sitting alone at London South on 16 May 2023, ordered Kingdom Cleaning Limited to pay Ms A Oliveira £3,000 within 14 days in respect of her legal costs for the hearing, described as counsel's brief fee for the hearing.
The recorded sum was stated to comprise £2,500 plus VAT. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Costs judgment only. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant's legal costs for the 16 May 2023 hearing, described as counsel's brief fee for the hearing, in the sum of £3,000 (comprising £2,500 plus VAT). | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.