Case 2302370/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Joanne Cooper Miss Timea Gondosch v Gurleen Enterprise Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302370/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beckett
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Joanne Cooper Miss Timea Gondosch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Joanne Cooper started work on 16 January 2020 and that Timea Gondosch began paid training in December 2019 before working in the café. No written contracts or written particulars of employment were provided. When lockdown began in March 2020, the tribunal found that the parties agreed both claimants would be furloughed, supported by text messages. The reasons record TG as starting paid training on 12 December 2019, while paragraph 55 refers to 16 December 2019.
The tribunal found that both claimants remained employed through April and May 2020. The respondent reopened the café as takeaway only on 16 May 2020 and later said HMRC had rejected the furlough claim. On 10 to 12 June 2020, after a meeting with Timea Gondosch, the respondent sent P45s showing leaving dates in March; the tribunal found that sending the P45s dismissed both claimants without notice on 12 June 2020. Timea Gondosch's unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn at the hearing after she accepted that she had less than two years' service.
The tribunal held that pay arrears, holiday pay and notice pay were well founded. It awarded Joanne Cooper £1,193.28 for furlough-period pay arrears and £1,323 for accrued but untaken holiday, and Timea Gondosch £1,980 and £2,561 for the same heads. It also held that, because neither claimant had a written contract or written particulars, each was entitled to reasonable notice under s.86 ERA 1996 and made a further award under s.38 Employment Act 2002. The final orders were £2,742.28 to Joanne Cooper and £4,916.00 to Timea Gondosch.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Joanne Cooper: pay arrears for March to part of June 2020 were found due at 80% of her usual pay during the furlough period. | Upheld | — | £1,193 |
| Holiday pay | Joanne Cooper: accrued but untaken holiday on termination was awarded under the Working Time Regulations 1998, calculated at the furlough rate. | Upheld | — | £1,323 |
| Breach of contract | Joanne Cooper: the tribunal found she was entitled to reasonable notice because no written contract or particulars were provided, but the reasons do not separately itemise a pound figure for this head. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Timea Gondosch: the unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn at the hearing after she accepted she had less than two years' service; the judgment also records it as dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Timea Gondosch: pay arrears for March to part of June 2020 were found due at 80% of her usual pay during the furlough period. | Upheld | — | £1,980 |
| Holiday pay | Timea Gondosch: accrued but untaken holiday on termination was awarded under the Working Time Regulations 1998, calculated at the furlough rate. | Upheld |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,658
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- Regulation 14(3)(b) WTR 1998
- Regulation 13(5) WTR 1998
- s.86 ERA 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- common law reasonable notice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.