Case 2302387/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Cruise v Zad Siadatan and Loius Siadatan Connect Nationwide Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302387/2020
- Decision date
- 7 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mclaren Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Cruise
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered an application to strike out. By a letter dated 25/01/22, it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide evidence that she had complied with the Unless Order of 31/08/21. She did not do so, and the Unless Order therefore took effect.
As a result, the complaints of disability discrimination and sex discrimination were struck out. The judgment does not record any remedy award for those claims.
The tribunal noted that the claimant’s remaining claims were still listed for a preliminary hearing on 08/04/22.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal struck out the disability discrimination complaint under rule 37 after the claimant did not provide evidence that she had complied with the Unless Order of 31/08/21. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal struck out the sex discrimination complaint under rule 37 after the claimant did not provide evidence that she had complied with the Unless Order of 31/08/21. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- Unless Order
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.