Case 2302397/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T N Hameed v London United Busway Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302397/2021
- Decision date
- 2 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T N Hameed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that by letter dated 01 August 2022 the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because of non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 29 November 2022 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis the Tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 18 to 21 July 2023 did not take place. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive causes of action in the extracted text. It states that 'the claim' was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 29 November 2022 and had not actively pursued the claim, and because the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 01 August 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.