Case 2302406/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Gayle v Villa Club Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302406/2019
- Decision date
- 25 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Gayle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Villa Club Ltd failed to present a response within the prescribed time limit. On that basis, under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the claim succeeded.
The judgment does not set out the underlying factual allegations in the extracted text. It states only that liability was determined in the claimant's favour by default and that the amount of any remedy would be decided at a Remedy Hearing.
No monetary award is recorded in the extracted judgment text. No lay members are listed, and the only named judicial office-holder is Employment Judge Wright, who signed the judgment on 25 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claim, but the GOV.UK listing for this case categorises it as unlawful deduction from wages. The respondent failed to present a response within the prescribed time limit, so the claim succeeded under Rule 21 and remedy was to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.