Case 2302416/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Adrian Wadey v Capital Coin Maintenance Ltd (in liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302416/2020
- Decision date
- 8 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Adrian Wadey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal extended the time limit to present the claim to 17 June 2020 under section 189(5) TULRCA and therefore held that it had jurisdiction. It amended the respondent's name to Capital Coin Maintenance Ltd (in liquidation). The respondent did not attend and no response was received. The tribunal found that the respondent had no recognition agreement with a trade union and no employee representatives, and that over 20 employees were made redundant on 13 May 2020 without prior consultation or notice. Mr Adrian Wadey was one of those affected employees, and his gross weekly pay at the time of redundancy was £742.40.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Claim for failure to comply with the collective redundancy provisions of section 188 TULRCA. The judgment orders remuneration under section 189(4) TULRCA for a 90-day period, but does not state a single lump-sum amount for the claimant. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.189(5) TULRCA
- s.188 TULRCA
- s.189(4) TULRCA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.