Case 2302428/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Phillips v Continental Landscape Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302428/2022
- Decision date
- 19 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal on 19 January 2023 before Employment Judge Ferguson. The claimant, Mr T Phillips, appeared in person with assistance from his brother, and the respondent, Continental Landscape Ltd, was represented by a solicitor attending by video link.
The Tribunal decided that the claim was dismissed because it was out of time and the Tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it. No substantive liability findings were made on the underlying complaint, and the written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No remedy was awarded, and the record does not set out any compensation, basic award, or other monetary figure. The written record also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action. The Tribunal dismissed the claim because it was out of time and therefore outside its jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.