Case 2302430/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr U Ahmed v Haymarket Media Group — 2026
- Case reference
- 2302430/2018
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr U Ahmed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim. It does not record any findings on liability, the factual issues in dispute, or the legal basis of the claim.
No remedy was awarded, and the decision contains no separate breakdown of compensation or other monetary relief. The extracted text is limited to the case caption, the dismissal note, and the judgment date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not identify the pleaded causes of action or record any merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.