Miss C Smith v Elizabeth Boardman — 2022

Case reference: 2302436/2017
Decision date: 14 December 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Balogun Dated

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss C Smith

Respondent

Elizabeth Boardman

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 15 November 2022, the tribunal gave Miss C Smith an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.

Acting Regional Employment Judge Balogun therefore struck out the claim on 14 December 2022. The extracted judgment does not record any determination of the substantive merits of the underlying claims, and no remedy was awarded.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Working time regulations	The judgment records only that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued; the underlying type is taken from the case listing category 'Working Time Regulations'.	Struck out	—	—
Other	The judgment records only that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued; this entry reflects the case listing category 'Written Pay Statement'.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.