Case 2302443/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Morat v Aviation 360 Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302443/2022
- Decision date
- 12 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Morat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South by CVP on 23 June 2023 before Employment Judge Rice-Birchall. Ms Morat appeared in person and the respondent, Aviation 360 Limited, did not attend. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and issued a written record of the decision, with written reasons only to follow if requested in time.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £4,981.59 net. It also found that the respondent had discriminated against the claimant because of race and ordered compensation of £3,500. The written record does not set out further reasoning beyond the announcement of those outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,982 |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Race | £3,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,482
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.