Case 2302444/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A McQuilkin v National Probation Service — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302444/2018
- Decision date
- 4 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A McQuilkin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 and recorded that the claimant, Miss A McQuilkin, had brought a disability discrimination claim against the National Probation Service. The judgment states that the claim succeeded.
No substantive findings on liability are set out in the extracted text beyond the statement that the disability discrimination claim succeeded. The judgment also records that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing, so no compensation figure is given in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Rule 21 judgment states that the claim for Disability Discrimination succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.