Case 2302448/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr J Brotherton, NPS — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302448/2018
- Decision date
- 19 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at London South, before Employment Judge Balogun, gave judgment on a preliminary issue on 19 September 2019. The claimant, Mr M Phillips, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr J Brotherton of NPS.
The tribunal dismissed the claims of unfair dismissal and age discrimination, together with the claims for a redundancy payment, notice pay and other payments. The sole reason recorded in the judgment was that the claims had been presented out of time.
No remedy was awarded, and the judgment does not record any further substantive findings on the merits of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Dismissed because presented out of time. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim described in the judgment as 'notice pay and other payments'; dismissed because presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.