Case 2302451/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Heaton v Outsprint Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302451/2021
- Decision date
- 28 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Heaton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 12 July 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that a judgment could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to make contributions to the claimant’s pension program. The judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £2,358.88.
The judgment records the same figure as the total payable, so the award appears to be a single sum and no separate breakdown of remedy components is given.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to make contributions to the claimant’s pension program and ordered payment of £2,358.88. | Upheld | — | £2,359 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,359
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.