Case 2302479/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Reci v TDQ Steaks Limited Heard — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302479/2020
- Decision date
- 5 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Reci
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 4 and 5 April 2022 by CVP before Employment Judge Pritchard. The Claimant, Mr G Reci, brought claims against TDQ Steaks Limited for unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages, and breach of contract.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim, stating that it was not well-founded. No further reasoning for that dismissal appears in the extracted judgment text.
The tribunal upheld the claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract. It ordered the Respondent to pay Mr Reci £6,074.50 in respect of the wages claim and £733.13 in respect of the contract claim, both stated to be payable without deductions. The total award recorded was £6,807.63.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,075 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £733 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,808
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.