Case 2302502/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Mungall v 1 Whittalls Wines Merchants 1 Ltd 2 Wine Retail Ltd Heard by Cloud video — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302502/2020
- Decision date
- 29 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Mungall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis record is a procedural judgment dated 19 June 2021, heard by Employment Judge Reed on 18 June 2021 by Cloud video. The tribunal dealt with a reconsideration issue and decided that its earlier decision to accept the second respondent's response was confirmed.
The judgment does not determine the underlying unfair dismissal, breach of contract, TUPE, or unlawful deduction claims on their merits. Instead, it directs that the final hearing in the matter will take place at the Employment Tribunal, Montague Court, 101 London Road, Croydon, on 21 January 2022 at 10:00am.
The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the written record being sent. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment did not determine a substantive claim. It records that, upon reconsideration, the tribunal confirmed its earlier decision to accept the second respondent's response and listed the final hearing. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.