Case 2302503/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Erondu v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302503/2022
- Decision date
- 15 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Musgrave-Cohen
- Venue
- in public
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Erondu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing by video on 14 November 2023, Employment Judge Musgrave-Cohen sat alone to determine a preliminary issue in claims numbered 2302503/2022 and 2300833/2023.
The judgment records that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at all material times relevant to the claims pursued in those case numbers. The judgment does not determine the substantive discrimination, wages, working time, or breach of contract complaints and makes no award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The public preliminary hearing judgment determined only that the claimant was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 at all material times relevant to the claims. It did not adjudicate liability or remedy for the pleaded disability discrimination claims. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.