Case 2302507/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Abrihem v Studio Cypherpunk Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302507/2022
- Decision date
- 31 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Abrihem
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 26 July 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 16 March 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £7,115.38 gross. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any tax or national insurance owed to HMRC in respect of that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £7,115.38 gross. The award was not split between claims. | Upheld | — | £7,115 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,115
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.