Case 2302545/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Svenhag v Innovator Capital Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302545/2022
- Decision date
- 24 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Svenhag
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs H Svenhag brought a claim against Innovator Capital Limited. The respondent presented no response. At the London South Employment Tribunal hearing on 24 January 2023, Employment Judge Ferguson recorded that the claim was dismissed because it was out of time and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No further findings on the merits, liability, or remedy are recorded in the judgment text supplied. The decision therefore turns entirely on the tribunal's conclusion on time limits and jurisdiction.
The judgment does not specify the underlying claim type in the body of the decision, although the GOV.UK listing for the case categorises it as unlawful deduction from wages. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action, but the GOV.UK listing for this case categorises it as unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal dismissed the claim because it was out of time and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.