Ms J Neil v Dermalogica UK Ltd — 2024

Case reference: 2302572/2023
Decision date: 22 January 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Martin Appearances
Venue: by CVP

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms J Neil

Respondent

Dermalogica UK Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The extracted judgment records that Ms J Neil was still employed by Dermalogica UK Ltd at the time of the decision. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed her unfair dismissal claim.

No monetary award is recorded in the extracted text, and no separate remedy calculation is set out. The extracted judgment also does not identify any legal test, lay members, or other adjudicated claims beyond the dismissal of the unfair dismissal claim.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the claimant was still employed by the respondent, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.