Case 2302584/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Billy-Joe Dixon and Mr Craig Smith v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302584/2023
- Decision date
- 18 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Billy-Joe Dixon and Mr Craig Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants were prison officers at HMP Belmarsh and were dismissed for gross misconduct after a disciplinary process arising from an incident involving use of force against a prisoner. They accepted that conduct was the stated reason for dismissal, but contended that the investigation and disciplinary process were unfair and affected by irregularities.
The tribunal found that the respondent's investigation was reasonable in the circumstances. Although CCTV from the landing outside the cell was not available at the disciplinary hearing, the tribunal found that this did not make the investigation or disciplinary process unreasonable because it would not have shown the incident inside the cell and the issue was explored during the disciplinary process. The tribunal also rejected complaints about the involvement of Ms Gill, non-disclosure of the management enquiry report, suspension issues, alleged collusion, the handling of SO Churchill's changed account, consistency with the treatment of other officers, and aspects of Mr Dixon's disciplinary hearing.
The tribunal was satisfied that Governor Louis believed the claimants had committed misconduct and that this belief rested on reasonable grounds following a reasonable investigation and disciplinary process. It further found that dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses to the findings made, given that the allegation found proved was treated as gross misconduct. The claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Both claimants alleged unfair dismissal following dismissal for gross misconduct. The tribunal dismissed the claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell
- Chubb Fire Security Ltd v Harper
- W Devis and Sons Ltd v Atkins
- London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Small
- range of reasonable responses
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- Turner v East Midlands Trains Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.