Case 2302587/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Lawrence v Genepool Personnel Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2302587/2022
- Decision date
- 5 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beckett Appearances
Parties
2 namedMrs M Lawrence
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningHearing under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 at London South ET. The respondent is in voluntary liquidation and was not represented. The Employment Judge dismissed the age discrimination claim on withdrawal and upheld five further claims.
The tribunal awarded: £1,015 (net) for unauthorised deductions from wages; £3,100 (net) for notice pay (breach of contract); £3,465 (net) for accrued but untaken holiday pay; and £6,975 (net) as damages for breach of contract for the unpaid contractual redundancy payment. On the s.38 Employment Act 2002 written statement of particulars claim, the tribunal found there were no exceptional circumstances making the minimum 2 weeks' gross pay award unjust or inequitable, but it was not just and equitable to award the higher 4 weeks' pay; the minimum award of £668 was made.
The total award is £15,993 (gross). Recoupment does not apply. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not produced.
Claims and outcomes
6 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £1,015 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld | — | £3,100 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £3,465 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld | — | £6,975 |
| Other | Upheld | — | £668 |
Legal tests applied
2 referencesRemedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,993
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.