Case 2302588/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B A Glazer v New Strand Motor Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302588/2022
- Decision date
- 9 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Wright
- Venue
- London South via hybrid hearing
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B A Glazer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London South hybrid hearing on 9 May 2023, before Employment Judge D Wright sitting alone, both parties gave evidence through interpreters. The tribunal dismissed the claimant's holiday pay claim and his unlawful deduction from wages claim, finding both were not well founded.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with pay slips from September 2020 until January 2021 inclusive, and had not provided P60s for tax years 2019/20 and 2020/21. It made a declaration that those documents had not been provided in breach of section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996, ordered that they be provided as a matter of urgency, and awarded the claimant £880 in respect of that head of claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The Tribunal made a declaration under section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 that pay slips for September 2020 to January 2021 inclusive, and P60s for tax years 2019/20 and 2020/21, had not been provided; it ordered those documents to be provided urgently and awarded £880 in respect of this head of claim. | Upheld | — | £880 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £880
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.