Case 2302592/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Nowak v Skyline Design London Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302592/2022
- Decision date
- 27 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Russell Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Nowak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Nowak's claim against Skyline Design London Limited was heard by Employment Judge R Russell at London South on 27 March 2023. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal decided that the claim had not been brought within the relevant time limits.
The tribunal further found that it had been reasonably practicable to bring the claim on time. On that basis, the claim was dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment text does not identify the pleaded cause of action, but the published case listing is for unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal dismissed the claim because it was not brought within the relevant time limits and it was reasonably practicable to bring it on time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable to bring the claim on time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.