Case 2302600/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Rundle v Department for Work and Pensions — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302600/2019
- Decision date
- 14 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
- Venue
- via CVP
- Panel members
- Mr R Singh, Mr C Wilby
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Rundle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the case by CVP from 11 October 2021 to 14 October 2021 before Employment Judge Wright, Mr R Singh and Mr C Wilby. The claimant was represented by counsel, as was the respondent.
In a unanimous liability judgment, the Tribunal held that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal and unlawful discrimination contrary to the Equality Act 2010 failed and were dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The liability judgment states that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The liability judgment states that claims of unlawful discrimination contrary to the Equality Act 2010 failed and were dismissed. The judgment text does not itself specify the protected characteristic; disability is taken from the supplied gov.uk listing category. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.