Case 2302603/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Oakley v Boots Management Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2302603/2024
- Decision date
- 12 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Oakley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the disability discrimination claim because it had not been presented within the applicable time limit. It found that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit.
The tribunal also dismissed the claim of constructive unfair dismissal because it had not been presented within the applicable time limit. It found that it had been reasonably practicable to present that claim in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states the claim of disability discrimination, however expressed, was out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal and dismisses it because it was out of time and reasonably practicable to present in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- just and equitable to extend the time limit
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.