Case 2302605/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Myers v Westminster Bridge Hotel Operator Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302605/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
- Panel members
- Miss N Murphy, Mr D Newlyn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Myers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Myers brought claims of unfair dismissal and discrimination against Westminster Bridge Hotel Operator Ltd. The case was heard at London South (Croydon) via CVP on 1 and 2 February 2023 before Employment Judge Wright, with Miss N Murphy and Mr D Newlyn sitting as the lay members. The written judgment records that both the unfair dismissal claim and the discrimination claim contrary to the Equality Act 2010 failed and were dismissed.
The public record does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time by a party. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written record refers only to discrimination contrary to the Equality Act 2010; the case listing identifies this as disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.