Case 2302610/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Messina v SMP Electrical Contractors Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302610/2020
- Decision date
- 18 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beckett London
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Messina
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 18 January 2022 before Employment Judge Beckett sitting alone, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages.
The written judgment ordered the respondent to pay a gross sum of £834. The judgment states that this consisted of £188 of unpaid statutory sick pay, £306 for 9 days of unpaid holiday, and £340 described as a compensatory award because the respondent had not provided particulars of employment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of a gross sum of £834. The award was said to comprise £188 unpaid SSP, £306 for 9 days unpaid holiday, and £340 described as a compensatory award because the respondent did not provide particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £834 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £834
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £340
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.