Case 2302622/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Bedford v Mastermind Promotions Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302622/2020
- Decision date
- 15 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Bedford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages in the total sum of £3,827. That sum was made up of £903 commission for January to March 2020, £2,339 wages for 30 March to 20 April 2020, and £585 holiday pay for 4 days.
The judgment records that the award should be made on a gross basis, following Walters t/a Rosewood v Barik UKEAT/0053/16/BA, but may be satisfied by payment of the net amount due together with any tax and national insurance payable to HMRC. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages comprising commission for January to March 2020 (£903), wages from 30 March to 20 April 2020 (£2,339), and holiday pay for 4 days (£585). | Upheld | — | £3,827 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,827
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Walters t/a Rosewood v Barik UKEAT/0053/16/BA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.