Case 2302646/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. A Rydz v Ramco Dental limited trading as One Dental Care — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302646/2017
- Decision date
- 7 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Representation
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. A Rydz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal order in case 2302646/2017 heard at London South Croydon on 7 August 2019 before Employment Judge Sage Representation. It identifies the claimant as Ms A Rydz and the respondent as Ramco Dental Limited trading as One Dental Care.
The tribunal states that the claimant's claims are dismissed on withdrawal. No findings of fact or liability reasons are set out in the text provided, and the judgment does not record any substantive determination of the pleaded claims.
No remedy was awarded and no compensation figure is stated. The judgment is confined to the procedural disposal of the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal; no merits determination is given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal; no merits determination is given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal; no merits determination is given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.