Case 2302647/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For First v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 2302647/2018
- Decision date
- 20 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For First
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge K Andrews in London South on 20 December 2018, dealt with Mr C Duddy's claim against Securitas Security Services (UK) Ltd and OCS Group UK Ltd. The judgment records a single outcome: the claim of unfair constructive dismissal against the second respondent.
The tribunal struck out that claim on the basis that it had no reasonable prospects of success. No separate liability findings, remedy assessment, or monetary award are recorded in the written judgment, and the note confirms that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of unfair constructive dismissal against the second respondent was struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.