Case 2302655/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Bhatti v Nimesh Yadev and 2 others — 2018
- Case reference
- 2302655/2018
- Decision date
- 28 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hildebrand Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr Z Bhatti
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 21 December 2018 before Regional Employment Judge Hildebrand, the Respondents did not attend. The tribunal found that the Claimant was entitled to £1,338.93 for unlawful deduction of wages, payable jointly and severally by the Respondents.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed by reason of his assertion of a statutory right. No basic award was made. Instead, the tribunal awarded a compensatory award of four weeks' pay based on 70 hours per week at the national minimum wage rate of £7.83, producing £2,192.40 gross.
The tribunal recorded that the compensatory award was made gross because there was no evidence that the Claimant would pay tax on any of the sums, and that the recoupment regulations did not apply because the Claimant said he had not received state benefits during the relevant period. It further found that the Claimant had not been given a statement of initial particulars of employment after one month, so it made an additional award under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002 of four weeks' pay, £2,192.40, because the default was considered serious. The total payable was £5,723.73.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded jointly and severally for unlawful deduction of wages. | Upheld | — | £1,339 |
| Unfair dismissal | Found unfair dismissal by reason of the Claimant's assertion of a statutory right; no basic award was made. | Upheld | — | £2,192 |
| Other | Award under s.38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a statement of initial particulars of employment after one month; tribunal said the default was serious. | Upheld | — | £2,192 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,724
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,192
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- assertion of a statutory right
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.