Case 2302665/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G McKivett v Quality Care Insurance Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302665/2019
- Decision date
- 7 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G McKivett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment entry, dated 7 May 2020 and signed by Employment Judge Wright, records the disposal of claims in the two linked case numbers 2302665/2019 and 2304667/2019. In 2302665/2019, the claims of unfair dismissal, discrimination based upon marriage or civil partnership, breach of contract and redundancy pay were dismissed upon withdrawal. The age discrimination claim in that case was recorded as proceeding.
In 2304667/2019, the claims of age discrimination, discrimination based upon marriage or civil partnership and redundancy pay were dismissed upon withdrawal. The unfair dismissal claim in that case was recorded as proceeding. The extracted text records no substantive findings on the merits, no legal test, and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | In 2302665/2019, this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal in both 2302665/2019 and 2304667/2019. | Withdrawn | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
| Breach of contract | In 2302665/2019, this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed upon withdrawal in both 2302665/2019 and 2304667/2019. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | In 2304667/2019, this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.