Case 2302705/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Corner v HFH Healthcare Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302705/2018
- Decision date
- 7 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- East London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Corner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms C Corner's claims against HFH Healthcare Limited were struck out. Employment Judge M Warren said this was because the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted by the Claimant was unreasonable, because of breach of an order of the tribunal, and because a fair hearing was no longer possible.
The extracted judgment text does not identify the underlying pleaded causes of action, but the GOV.UK listing for the case categorises it as involving public interest disclosure and unfair dismissal. The judgment itself is limited to the strike-out decision and does not record any substantive findings on liability or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the Claimant's claims were struck out, but it does not specify the underlying pleaded claim in the extracted text. This claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant's claims were struck out, but it does not specify the underlying pleaded claim in the extracted text. This claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.