Case 2302715/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Davies v Stonegate Pub Company Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2302715/2024
- Decision date
- 27 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart
- Panel members
- Ms Whitlam, Mr Rogers
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr Davies's claims against Stonegate Pub Company Limited at London South on 20-25 October 2025 before Employment Judge Hart, Ms Whitlam and Mr Rogers. It dismissed the complaints of constructive unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasoning beyond the dispositive orders. It records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a complaint for constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment describes this complaint as discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment describes this complaint as failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.