Case 2302723/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Grabda v The Coach House Brighton Limited (dissolved) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302723/2019
- Decision date
- 15 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Grabda
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote CVP hearing on 15 January 2021 before Employment Judge Corrigan sitting alone. The tribunal referred to the ET1, ET3, the Case Management Order dated 23 October 2020, the Companies House record for the respondent, and documents provided by the claimant, including correspondence from the National Insurance Fund.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent had dissolved and ceased to exist, so no orders or judgment could be made against it. On that basis, the claims for notice pay and holiday pay were dismissed.
The tribunal nevertheless found that the claimant had a right to a redundancy payment of £2,219, calculated as 5 times a week's pay of £443.80. The judgment does not record any further monetary breakdown beyond that redundancy figure.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to a claim for notice pay; this is mapped here to breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to a claim for holiday pay and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant had a right to a redundancy payment of £2,219, described as 5 x a week's pay of £443.80. | Upheld | — | £2,219 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,219
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.