Case 2302727/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Barrett v Innovator Capital Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302727/2022
- Decision date
- 24 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Barrett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 24 January 2023, Employment Judge Ferguson determined the case by video with the claimant, Mr C Barrett, appearing in person and no response having been presented for the respondent, Innovator Capital Limited. The tribunal recorded a single substantive finding: that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay Mr Barrett the gross sum of £5,637.19. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days, so the published decision contains no further explanation of the underlying factual basis or calculation beyond the award amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,637.19. | Upheld | — | £5,637 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,637
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.