Case 2302728/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Flint v Station Garage — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302728/2018
- Decision date
- 3 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment in Mrs V Flint v Station Garage, issued on 3 September 2019 by Employment Judge Ferguson Date, states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The tribunal made no findings on liability or the underlying merits of the dispute.
No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment. The decision is limited to the procedural disposal of the case after the claimant's withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive merits finding is recorded for this complaint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive merits finding is recorded for this complaint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive merits finding is recorded for this complaint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.