Case 2302732/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Davies v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2302732/2024
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Atkins
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, comprising Employment Judge Atkins sitting alone at London South, heard the claims of Mr D Davies against Royal Mail Group Ltd over three days in September 2025. The claimant appeared in person, assisted by Mrs Davies, while the respondent was represented by Mrs Simpson of counsel.
The tribunal determined two disability-related claims. The claim of indirect disability discrimination under section 19 of the Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and failed. The claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 was found to be well founded and succeeded.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and the written record records that the respondent must pay the claimant the gross sum of £6,322 by 8 October 2025. Written reasons were not provided in this document, so the tribunal's detailed reasoning is not available from this text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination claim under section 19 Equality Act 2010 found not well founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 succeeded; gross sum of £6,322 ordered to be paid by 8 October 2025. Judgment text refers to 'sections 20 and 2' which appears to be a typographical error for sections 20 and 21. | Upheld | Disability | £6,322 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,322
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 19 Equality Act 2010
- sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.