Case 2302746/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Oakley-Thomas v Visiongain Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302746/2019
- Decision date
- 13 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr T Oakley-Thomas
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment for case 2302746/2019 states only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant, Mr T Oakley-Thomas. No substantive findings on liability, no reasoning on the age discrimination or unfair dismissal issues, and no remedy are recorded in the extracted text.
Employment Judge Martin signed the judgment on 13 December 2019. The extracted text names the respondents as Visiongain LTD and Sara Peerun, but it does not set out any separate determination of the pleaded claims beyond the withdrawal and dismissal of the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not record any merits findings; it states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not record any merits findings; it states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.