Mrs E Carrigan v PCAS Kent Limited — 2025

Case reference: 2302775/2024
Decision date: 5 March 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Aspinall Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs E Carrigan

Respondent

PCAS Kent Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By an order dated 17 July 2024, the tribunal gave Mrs E Carrigan an opportunity to provide disclosure and a schedule of loss by 9 August 2024. The reasons record that she failed to make representations in writing.

On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim. The judgment does not contain any merits findings on the pleaded issues and does not record any financial award.

The hearing listed for 4 September 2025 and 5 September 2025 was stated not to take place. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Aspinall on 5 March 2025.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	The extracted judgment does not separately analyse this claim on the merits; the dismissal is recorded globally after the claimant failed to make written representations in response to the tribunal's order.	Dismissed	Race	—
Unfair dismissal	The extracted judgment does not separately analyse this claim on the merits; the dismissal is recorded globally after the claimant failed to make written representations in response to the tribunal's order.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.