Case 2302784/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S A Ismail v Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302784/2024
- Decision date
- 10 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S A Ismail
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal refused the claimant's application dated 24 October 2024 for reconsideration of the judgment sent to the parties on 10 October 2024. It did so under Rule 72(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, finding that there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked.
The judgment records that nothing in the claimant's application undermined the reasoning underpinning the original judgment. It also states that the strike-out of the unfair dismissal complaint did not prevent the claimant from pursuing his case that his dismissal was an act of discrimination, harassment or victimisation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The reconsideration judgment refused the claimant's application to vary or revoke the earlier judgment. It refers to the strike-out of the complaint of unfair dismissal, but does not set out the original judgment's full reasoning. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 72(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.