Case 2302785/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Tackie v London South East Colleges — 2025
- Case reference
- 2302785/2023
- Decision date
- 16 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Tackie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that the claims arising from the factual complaints set out in paragraphs 7.2 and 7.3 of the Case Management Order dated 30 July 2025 were dismissed because the claimant withdrew them. No substantive findings of fact or liability reasons are set out in the extracted decision text beyond the withdrawal-based dismissal.
The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. On the extracted text available here, there is no recorded remedy, award, or further analysis of the underlying complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment does not set out the substantive factual allegations in the decision text; it records only that the claims arising from paragraphs 7.2 and 7.3 of the Case Management Order were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying wage complaint in the decision text; it records only that the claims arising from paragraphs 7.2 and 7.3 of the Case Management Order were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.