Case 2302788/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Zjawiony v DSL Executive Cars Limited (In Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302788/2019
- Decision date
- 7 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Zjawiony
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment dated 7 December 2020, Employment Judge Balogun found that Mr M Zjawiony had been dismissed by reason of redundancy. The tribunal held that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,048.88 and that the respondent also owed him arrears of pay of £500.
The tribunal further found that the breach of contract claim was well founded and awarded £500 for contractual notice plus £35 for expenses. It also ordered payment of £500 in lieu of accrued holiday entitlement. No payment was made for overtime because the tribunal said the claim form did not show any entitlement under the contract. The total sum ordered was £3,583.88.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,049 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent owed arrears of pay. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim succeeded; the award comprised £500 for contractual notice and £35 for expenses. | Upheld | — | £535 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent owed £500 in lieu of accrued holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Other | No payment was made for overtime because the tribunal said the claim form showed no entitlement under the contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,584
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.