Case 2302789/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Greetham v Debenhams Retail Limited (in Administration) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302789/2020
- Decision date
- 19 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs G Greetham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 8 February 2023 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out. The stated issue was that the claimant had not told the Tribunal that she had obtained the administrator's consent or the court's permission to allow the claim to proceed, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The Tribunal found that the claimant had failed to provide the necessary consent or adequate reasons for that failure. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The gov.uk listing categories refer to Protective Award and Redundancy, but the judgment only states that the claim was struck out for failure to provide administrator consent or court permission required under the Insolvency Act 1986. The specific pleaded claim is not identified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.