Case 2302790/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Nyam (representing himself) For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302790/2018
- Decision date
- 24 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
- Venue
- London South
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr A Nyam (representing himself) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Hyams-Parish at London South Employment Tribunal on 23 and 24 September 2019, considered Mr A Nyam's claim against Serco Limited. It recorded that the claimant was representing himself and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment states that the claim of constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the record because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.