Case 2302795/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Carroll v Living Oak Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302795/2020
- Decision date
- 9 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sekhon
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mrs S Dengate, Ms C Edwards
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Carroll
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London South Employment Tribunal hearing on 7, 8 and 9 June 2022, before Employment Judge Sekhon sitting with Mrs S Dengate and Ms C Edwards, Mrs S Carroll appeared in person and Living Oak Limited did not attend, although it was aware of the hearing. The tribunal's written record states that the claimant was not automatically unfairly dismissed, and that her claims therefore failed and were dismissed.
The extracted judgment does not set out the tribunal's oral reasoning, but it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested. No monetary award is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states only that the claimant was not automatically unfairly dismissed. The extracted text does not specify the statutory basis beyond that wording, although the case listing category was Public Interest Disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.