Case 2302795/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Kealey v Boots Managements Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2302795/2024
- Decision date
- 19 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Kealey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claims in case numbers 2302795/2024 and 2600828/2024. It said the claimant had been given an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, about why the claims should not be struck out because she had not complied with standard suggested orders and had not actively pursued the claims.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claims. The hearing listed for 13 to 16 October 2025 will not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not identify the substantive type attached to each case number, but the GOV.UK listing for this decision includes disability discrimination and unfair dismissal; this entry is assigned on that basis. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the substantive type attached to each case number, but the GOV.UK listing for this decision includes disability discrimination and unfair dismissal; this entry is assigned on that basis. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.