Case 2302800/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Springer v Coppernob Limited [DISSOLVED] and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302800/2017
- Decision date
- 5 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge V Wright Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs D Springer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs D Springer’s claim against Coppernob Limited and Scarlett & Jo Ltd was struck out. The Tribunal recorded that, by a letter dated 10 March 2023, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge V Wright ordered that the claim be struck out.
No substantive findings were made on the underlying merits of the case, and the judgment records no remedy or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 10 March 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. No sufficient representations were made, and no hearing was requested. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.