Case 2302812/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Williams v Serco Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302812/2022
- Decision date
- 14 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. He did not attend the case management hearing on 3 April 2023, and the Tribunal’s attempts to contact him at that hearing were unsuccessful.
Employment Judge Mitchell made case management orders requiring the claimant to provide further details of his claim, a disability impact statement with supporting medical evidence, and a schedule of loss by 24 May 2023. The judgment records that the claimant did not comply with those orders and that the Tribunal had no record of contact from him or his representative after the case management order.
The respondent applied for strike out on 7 September 2023. The Tribunal converted the listed final hearing into a preliminary hearing to consider strike out, but the claimant did not respond or attend. Employment Judge Reed concluded that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal’s order, the claim had not been actively pursued, and it was appropriate and just to strike out the complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was struck out because the claimant had not complied with Tribunal orders and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination complaint was struck out because the claimant had not complied with Tribunal orders and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.