Case 2302812/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Daniel Jaderko v Catey Hillier — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302812/2023
- Decision date
- 18 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Cox Date
- Venue
- LONDON SOUTH Remotely via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Daniel Jaderko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge N Cox on 8 December 2023, struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had not been continuously employed for two years ending on the effective date of termination. The judgment therefore records no determination of unfair dismissal on the merits.
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions in the weeks 30 January 2023 to 5 February 2023 and 27 March 2023 to 31 March 2023, and awarded the gross sum deducted, £734.00. It also recorded that the notice pay due for 27 March 2023 to 31 March 2023 was included in that award, so no separate sum was made for notice pay.
The tribunal further found that, when the proceedings began, the respondent was in breach of its obligation to provide a written statement of particulars compliant with section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Applying section 38(2) of the Employment Act 2002, it awarded the claimant the minimum sum of two weeks' pay, quantified at £734.00 gross. The total sum ordered was £1,468.00 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had not been continuously employed for two years ending on the effective date of termination, and the complaint was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found well-founded in respect of the weeks 30 January 2023 to 5 February 2023 and 27 March 2023 to 31 March 2023. The Tribunal awarded the gross sum deducted, £734.00; it also recorded that notice pay for 27 March 2023 to 31 March 2023 was included in that sum and no separate award was made for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £734 |
| Other | At the time proceedings began, the respondent was in breach of its obligation to provide a written statement of particulars compliant with section 1 ERA 1996. The Tribunal awarded the minimum sum of two weeks' pay under section 38(2) of the Employment Act 2002, quantified at £734.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £734 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,468
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.